You have lied, not cared about this, and been spewing random things to get me to go away. You have not even tried to be helpful and just been filibustering your way to get rid of me. How have you been formal OR constructive? You’ve provoked this from the start. And you know that “anonymous IP”, while being what I am, (though hardly able to understand how an IP address also makes me anonymous) is an insulting term on Wikipedia, and people who do not log in are looked down on. So there goes your claim at being formal, just two sentences after it. Now, the plot, I do not know how to fix. I cannot for the life of me think of a reliable source that can explain the plot. It’s just there. Like, how am I supposed to cite that to your satisfaction? I watched it. “The Joker goes to the hospital and convinces Dent to exact revenge on the corrupt cops and mobsters responsible for Rachel’s death, as well as Batman and Gordon. After sparing the Joker,” This is just a lie. It is misleading the reader. It’s not what what happens. This plot summary makes Two Face a different character at a pivotal part of the movie. This is WHERE Harvey Dent becomes Two-Face. This should be something that we, as The Dark Knight fans, feel is one of the movie’s climaxes. Harvey turns his face and you see what he has become. And you are content to lie to make it fit into a sentence? Does no one else feel that explaining what happens here is important? Sure it’s a summary, but it’s also one of the most important parts of the movie, and I don’t need citations to prove that. Look, I did not come here trying to cause a fight. I simply wanted to see the reactions people give to editing the article in two ways - the plot summary, and themes. And all you have done is say “NO.”, “NO.” and “GO AWAY WITHOUT CITATIONS.” That is not constructive, or formal.
But none of that matters. I’m not here to fight, or am I interested in preserving your ego. It seems apparent that the Plot Summary will stay the way it is for the sake of length and conciseness, but no one can just dropkick my Themes idea out of the realm of discussion. I think this movie does have themes, and that an encyclopedia entry on it should cover them. So let’s stop fighting, or throwing around who did whats, and focus on improving the article
— —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.214.207 (talk) 09:08, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
